Malware & Monsters
  • 🏠 Home
  • 📖 Players Handbook
  • 🎯 IM Handbook
  • 👥 Community
  • ❓ FAQ
  • 📧 Contact
  • 📚 Glossary
  • 📥 Downloads

    • 📱 HTML (Offline)

    • 📖 Players Handbook (HTML)
    • 🎯 IM Handbook (HTML)

    • 📄 PDF Files

    • 📖 Players Handbook (PDF)
    • 🎯 IM Handbook (PDF)

On this page

  • LockBit Scenario: Sterling Legal Group Merger Crisis
    • Scenario Details for IMs
      • Opening Presentation
      • Initial Symptoms to Present:
      • Key Discovery Paths:
        • Detective Investigation Leads:
        • Protector System Analysis:
        • Tracker Network Investigation:
        • Communicator Stakeholder Interviews:
      • Mid-Scenario Pressure Points:
      • Evolution Triggers:
      • Resolution Pathways:
        • Technical Success Indicators:
        • Business Success Indicators:
        • Learning Success Indicators:
      • Common IM Facilitation Challenges:
        • If Client Notification Is Delayed:
        • If Professional Liability Is Ignored:
        • If Court Deadlines Are Forgotten:
      • Success Metrics for Session:
  • Edit this page
  • View source
  • Report an issue

LockBit Scenario: Sterling Legal Group Merger Crisis

Sterling Legal Group: International law firm with 350 attorneys specializing in mergers and acquisitions
Ransomware • LockBit
STAKES
Client confidentiality + Active case preparation + Professional reputation + Legal privilege protection
HOOK
Sterling Legal Group is three days away from a major corporate merger closing worth $4.2 billion when all computer systems display ransom demands. The firm discovers that threat actors have stolen client files, case strategies, and confidential communications, threatening to publish everything including attorney-client privileged information. Partners must decide whether to pay ransom or risk exposing clients' most sensitive legal matters.
PRESSURE
Merger deadline approaches - any delay or data exposure could derail multi-billion-dollar transaction + Attorney-client privilege breach
FRONT • 120 minutes • Advanced
Sterling Legal Group: International law firm with 350 attorneys specializing in mergers and acquisitions
Ransomware • LockBit
NPCs
  • Richard Sterling (Senior Managing Partner): Coordinating merger closing while managing ransomware crisis, must balance client obligations with firm survival and professional ethics
  • Emily Thompson (Chief Information Officer): Dealing with complete system encryption affecting all case files, trying to assess data theft scope while coordinating recovery efforts
  • Daniel Park (Lead M&A Partner): Cannot access deal documents for active transactions, facing closing deadlines while managing client communications about potential data exposure
  • Jessica Martinez (General Counsel): Managing legal implications of breach including attorney-client privilege, professional liability, and regulatory notification requirements
SECRETS
  • Firm's backup systems were not properly tested and some may be compromised
  • Attackers specifically targeted high-value client files and merger documentation
  • Previous security assessments identified vulnerabilities that were not addressed due to budget constraints

Scenario Details for IMs

Opening Presentation

“It’s Thursday morning at Sterling Legal Group, and the firm is in final preparations for a $4.2 billion merger closing on Monday. Attorneys are working around the clock reviewing documents and coordinating with clients when every computer screen suddenly displays ransom demands. Within hours, the managing partner receives direct contact from threat actors claiming to have stolen confidential client files, case strategies, and attorney-client privileged communications, threatening to publish everything if ransom isn’t paid.”

Initial Symptoms to Present:

  • “All workstations displaying ransom demands with firm-specific threats about client data”
  • “Document management systems completely encrypted affecting active case preparation”
  • “Threat actors contacted partners claiming to have stolen merger documents and client files”
  • “Email systems down affecting client communications and court filing deadlines”

Key Discovery Paths:

Detective Investigation Leads:

  • Digital forensics reveal systematic targeting of high-value client files and merger documentation
  • Email analysis shows initial compromise through spear-phishing targeting specific attorneys
  • Timeline indicates attackers maintained access for months, monitoring case developments

Protector System Analysis:

  • Complete encryption of document management systems and case files
  • Backup assessment reveals critical gaps in disaster recovery testing
  • Network segmentation failures allowed lateral movement to privileged client data

Tracker Network Investigation:

  • Data exfiltration analysis shows terabytes of confidential legal documents stolen
  • Communication patterns indicate professional criminal operation with legal industry knowledge
  • Evidence of reconnaissance targeting specific high-value cases and clients

Communicator Stakeholder Interviews:

  • Client communications regarding potential exposure of confidential information
  • Court notification requirements for delayed filings and case preparation issues
  • Professional liability assessment and ethics committee consultation needs

Mid-Scenario Pressure Points:

  • Hour 1: Merger team cannot access due diligence documents needed for Monday closing
  • Hour 2: Threat actors send sample of stolen client communications to demonstrate data theft
  • Hour 3: Opposing counsel in active litigation learns of potential data exposure
  • Hour 4: Professional liability insurance carrier demands immediate risk assessment

Evolution Triggers:

  • If ransom payment is made, attackers may still threaten clients directly or sell data
  • If payment is refused, confidential client data begins appearing on criminal forums
  • If response exceeds 72 hours, threat actors may contact media and opposing counsel directly

Resolution Pathways:

Technical Success Indicators:

  • Emergency document recovery protocols activated using verified clean backups
  • Secure communication channels established for client notifications and court filings
  • Law enforcement coordination for investigation while protecting client confidentiality

Business Success Indicators:

  • Client relationships maintained through transparent communication and professional handling
  • Court deadlines met through alternative documentation and emergency procedures
  • Professional ethics obligations fulfilled while managing crisis response

Learning Success Indicators:

  • Team understands data protection requirements in professional service environments
  • Participants recognize intersection of cybersecurity and professional liability
  • Group demonstrates crisis communication balancing transparency with confidentiality obligations

Common IM Facilitation Challenges:

If Client Notification Is Delayed:

“Your technical investigation is thorough, but the managing partner needs to know: when and how do you notify clients that their confidential information may have been stolen? Professional ethics rules require prompt disclosure.”

If Professional Liability Is Ignored:

“While you’re working on recovery, the firm’s malpractice insurance carrier is demanding immediate risk assessment. How does potential client data exposure affect professional liability and firm survival?”

If Court Deadlines Are Forgotten:

“Your security response is excellent, but Maria has three court filings due tomorrow and cannot access case files. Do you request extensions and reveal the breach, or find alternative solutions?”

Success Metrics for Session:

 

Malmons aka Malware Monsters © 2025 Lena Yu aka LambdaMamba. All rights reserved.

  • Edit this page
  • View source
  • Report an issue