Public Systems Under Tournament Pressure
2026-02-03
You’re part of Level Up Gaming Cafe’s incident response team, racing to restore 80 compromised gaming stations before Saturday’s major esports tournament.
Investigate and contain a malware outbreak across public customer systems while protecting customer data, maintaining payment security, and saving the biggest tournament of the year.
New to facilitating Malware & Monsters? Start here:
IM Quick Start Guide - Everything you need to run this scenario in one concise document
Your gaming cafe is buzzing with pre-tournament excitement. Saturday’s esports tournament has 150 registered participants, sponsors arriving tomorrow, and streaming partners ready to broadcast to thousands of viewers.
Then your Systems Administrator bursts into the office:
“We have a serious problem. Customers are complaining about browser redirects and weird ads during gameplay. I just checked—gaming stations are full of fake software. ‘Graphics driver updates,’ ‘game performance boosters,’ ‘essential gaming utilities’—customers have been downloading this stuff all week.”
Tournament starts in 48 hours. Your reputation, your revenue, and your customers’ data are all at stake.
Quick Reference
Gaming cafe and esports tournament venue serving local gaming community and competitive esports circuit
25 employees (8 tournament staff and event coordinators, 6 technical support and station maintenance, 7 food service and concessions, 4 administrative and management personnel), operating 80 high-performance gaming stations across 6,000 square foot entertainment venue
Hourly gaming station rentals for casual and competitive gamers, weekly local tournaments and community leagues, monthly regional esports competitions, food and beverage service, gaming peripheral sales, sponsorship and partnership management with gaming brands
80 gaming PCs with competitive-grade hardware and software, centralized payment processing for station rentals and concessions, tournament streaming and broadcast infrastructure, real-time scoreboard and bracket management systems, customer account management for loyalty programs, network infrastructure supporting simultaneous high-bandwidth gaming sessions
Custom gaming PC builds (high-end GPUs, gaming peripherals, licensed software), centralized payment terminal network processing credit cards for station rentals and purchases, streaming equipment for tournament broadcasts to Twitch and YouTube, point-of-sale systems for concessions, customer database with payment information and gaming preferences, network infrastructure managing 80 simultaneous connections with low-latency requirements
Level Up Gaming Cafe is community gaming hub and competitive esports venue with 4-year operational history building reputation as premier destination for local gamers and regional tournament hosting. The venue serves dual customer base: casual gamers renting stations for entertainment ($5-15/hour depending on peak times and hardware tier) and competitive esports participants attending tournaments ($20-50 entry fees with prize pools). Current status: Saturday championship tournament representing venue’s largest event ever—150 registered participants, 8-hour competition schedule, $5,000 prize pool (venue’s largest), streaming partnership broadcasting to 3,000+ viewers, local business sponsorships including gaming peripheral companies and energy drink brands, $3,000 in tournament entry fees plus estimated $2,000 in concessions revenue, potential for establishing Level Up as regional esports destination attracting future high-profile events and sponsorship opportunities.
What’s At Risk:
Saturday morning, 6 hours until championship tournament begins. Level Up Gaming Cafe experiencing controlled chaos of tournament preparation. Owner Marcus Torres coordinating final setup—verifying 80 gaming stations operational with competition-approved game versions and settings, confirming streaming infrastructure ready for live broadcast to 3,000+ viewers, organizing sponsor banner placement and branded energy drink distribution, briefing tournament staff on 8-hour event schedule managing 150 participants across multiple game brackets. Local gaming peripheral company representative setting up demo stations featuring latest competitive gaming mice and mechanical keyboards. Streaming partner testing broadcast equipment ensuring professional production quality for largest audience Level Up has ever attracted. Sponsors expecting flawless execution demonstrating Level Up’s capability as regional esports venue worthy of future partnership investment.
Friday evening during tournament preparation, several staff members and early-arriving tournament participants used Level Up gaming stations to download “performance optimization” utilities and “FPS boosting” software widely shared across gaming communities—tools claiming to improve game performance, reduce input lag, and enhance competitive advantage. Gaming culture treats these utilities as standard practice: competitive gamers routinely download third-party software promising performance improvements, gaming forums share “essential downloads” for competitive play, and staff members installing popular gaming tools to optimize tournament stations for participant experience. Downloads came from gaming-focused websites with convincing branding: “CompetitiveEdge Gaming Optimizer” and “ProGamer Performance Suite” shared via Discord servers and gaming community forums.
Saturday morning, 6 hours before tournament start, technical support staff member Jake Peterson reports alarming discovery to Marcus: “Boss, I’m seeing weird browser behavior on gaming stations—pop-ups appearing even when games are running, browsers opening automatically to suspicious websites, some stations showing credit card payment forms we didn’t navigate to. I checked station 47 and found several executables I don’t recognize running: ‘GameBoost.exe’ and ‘FPS_Optimizer.exe.’ These weren’t part of our standard gaming software installation. When I tried to uninstall, more programs appeared. I think those ‘performance tools’ people downloaded yesterday weren’t legitimate utilities—they might be malware.”
Marcus investigates personally and discovers FakeBat trojan infection across 23 of 80 gaming stations—sophisticated browser-based malware dropper that disguises initial payload as gaming optimization software, then deploys additional malicious components including information stealers, credential harvesters, and payment card data collectors. Malware analysis reveals FakeBat’s capabilities: hijacking web browsers to inject fake payment forms stealing credit card information, monitoring clipboard for copied passwords and financial data, capturing screenshots during payment transactions, establishing persistent backdoor for future malware deployment, and connecting to command-and-control servers exfiltrating stolen customer data. The gaming stations affected are same systems used by customers for station rentals involving credit card processing—Level Up uses integrated payment terminals sharing network with gaming PCs, creating direct pathway from compromised gaming stations to payment processing infrastructure.
Customer service manager reporting incoming complaints: three customers called Saturday morning about fraudulent credit card charges appearing after visiting Level Up Friday evening—unauthorized transactions from overseas merchants totaling $800-1,200 per affected customer. One customer’s bank fraud department contacted customer asking: “Did you recently visit a gaming venue? We’re seeing pattern of card fraud matching transactions from entertainment establishments.” Marcus realizes FakeBat compromise likely already resulted in customer payment card theft affecting unknown number of Friday customers—payment card industry regulations require breach notification and forensic investigation if payment card data was accessed.
Critical Timeline:
Why This Vulnerability Exists:
Gaming culture normalizes third-party software downloads creating security vulnerability: Gaming community treats downloading third-party utilities, mods, performance tools, and “optimization” software as standard practice—competitive gamers routinely install programs promising FPS improvements, input lag reduction, graphics optimization, and competitive advantages shared through Discord servers, Reddit gaming forums, and YouTube tutorials. Level Up organizational culture reflects this gaming ecosystem: staff members are gamers themselves who use performance tools personally and recommend utilities to customers seeking competitive edge, venue encourages “customization” as part of gaming experience where customers can personalize station settings and download preferred software, tournament preparation includes installing “essential competitive gaming tools” to optimize stations for participant performance expectations. Marcus explains the normalization: “Gaming culture is built on optimization—everyone downloads performance utilities, streaming overlays, custom configuration tools, Discord plugins, hardware monitoring software. Our staff downloaded ‘gaming optimizers’ Friday because tournament participants expect stations configured for maximum competitive performance. Saying ‘don’t download anything’ in gaming venue is like telling restaurant not to season food—it goes against fundamental culture of how gamers operate. We thought we were providing better customer experience by optimizing stations with popular gaming tools community recommends.” This creates exploitable vulnerability: attackers understand gaming culture’s high tolerance for third-party software, design malware disguised as performance utilities gamers actively seek, distribute through gaming communities where security skepticism is lower than general internet usage, and achieve high infection rates because “downloading gaming tools” is culturally normalized behavior rather than recognized security risk.
Public access systems create impossible security versus customer experience tension: Gaming cafes face fundamental security challenge: maximize customer freedom to personalize gaming experience while protecting shared infrastructure from malicious activity. Level Up’s business model depends on customer experience flexibility—gamers can install preferred game settings, download custom configurations, use personal Discord accounts, access gaming communities, watch streaming content, and customize controls. Restrictive security controls (blocking downloads, limiting software installation, restricting browser access, monitoring all activity) destroy customer value proposition where gamers specifically choose gaming cafes for access to high-performance hardware with software flexibility home systems cannot provide. Jake describes the tension: “We’ve tried locking down stations before—customers complained they couldn’t install game mods, access their Discord servers, download tournament maps, or customize peripherals. We lost business to competing gaming cafes offering ‘full freedom’ systems. Marcus loosened restrictions because customer reviews said we were ‘too restrictive’ and ‘not real gaming experience.’ But unrestricted access means customers download anything including malware disguised as gaming tools. There’s no middle ground: strict security kills customer experience and revenue, but open access enables malware infections affecting payment security and operational stability.” This business model vulnerability cannot be resolved through technical controls alone—gaming cafe economics require customer system access creating inherent security risks where malware infections are predictable outcome of business model rather than preventable security failure.
Integrated payment and gaming networks enable credential theft and payment card compromise: Level Up’s network architecture reflects small business cost optimization: gaming stations, payment terminals, point-of-sale systems, streaming equipment, and administrative computers share single network infrastructure to reduce hardware and internet costs (single commercial internet connection, shared network switches, unified network management). This integration creates security vulnerability: compromised gaming PC used by customers gains network access to payment processing infrastructure, FakeBat malware can pivot from infected gaming station to payment terminals processing credit cards, stolen credentials from one system enable lateral movement to financial systems, and customer malware infections directly threaten payment card data security. Network segmentation separating gaming PCs from payment systems would require: duplicate internet connections ($400/month additional cost), separate network infrastructure (switches, routers, cabling requiring $15,000 capital investment), independent system administration (additional IT staff or managed services costing $2,000/month), and eliminated operational flexibility where staff currently access both gaming and financial systems seamlessly during busy periods. Marcus explains economics: “Separating gaming and payment networks costs more than our monthly profit margin. We’re 25-employee entertainment venue operating on 8% profit—cannot afford enterprise network architecture. Integrated network enables us to manage operations efficiently: tournament staff process entry fee payments at same workstations used for bracket management, concessions staff access POS systems while monitoring gaming station availability, administrative staff handle accounting while managing customer accounts. Network segmentation would require duplicate systems and staff workflows that small business economics cannot support.” This reveals structural vulnerability: small entertainment venues face security requirements (payment card protection) designed for enterprises with resources small businesses cannot afford, creating inevitable security gaps where business model economics prevent implementing industry-standard security controls.
Tournament deadline pressure overrides security thoroughness during critical preparation: Championship tournament represents Level Up’s largest financial investment and reputational opportunity—weeks of promotional marketing, sponsor coordination, participant registration, and operational planning depend on flawless Saturday execution. Friday tournament preparation created time pressure where security verification became “luxury we cannot afford”: staff focused on ensuring gaming stations had correct game versions, tournament settings configured properly, peripheral hardware functioning perfectly, streaming infrastructure tested and operational. When staff and participants downloaded “performance optimization” tools Friday evening, no one questioned legitimacy because: tournament preparation was behind schedule requiring rapid station optimization, “gaming utilities” came from Discord servers where competitive gamers routinely share tools, software claimed to provide competitive advantages tournament participants expected, and stopping to verify software legitimacy would delay tournament preparation when every hour mattered for Saturday readiness. Marcus admits the calculation: “Friday evening we had 80 stations to configure for Saturday tournament—game updates to install, tournament rule settings to apply, peripheral drivers to update, streaming overlays to test. When staff said ‘these gaming optimizers will speed up station configuration,’ I didn’t question it because we were behind schedule and needed faster preparation. Tournament success depends on perfect execution—couldn’t afford delays verifying every software download when participants arriving Saturday expected competition-ready systems. I chose tournament preparation speed over security verification because missing Saturday deadline guarantees disaster, but security risk seemed theoretical. That calculation was wrong, but it was rational given tournament pressure and operational constraints.” This demonstrates how deadline pressure predictably overrides security thoroughness when immediate high-stakes events demand operational focus, creating exploitable windows where attackers time malware campaigns for maximum impact during critical preparation periods when verification processes are informally suspended.
How This Gaming Cafe Actually Works:
Level Up Gaming Cafe operates in competitive entertainment market where customer experience, competitive gaming reputation, and operational costs determine business survival. Gaming cafe industry serves customers seeking: high-performance hardware exceeding home gaming systems, social gaming environment for community building, competitive tournament participation, and software flexibility home networks or workplace restrictions prevent. Successful venues balance customer freedom (download access, software customization, unrestricted browsing) with operational stability (preventing system damage, managing bandwidth, protecting payment security). Level Up’s competitive differentiation strategy focuses on tournament hosting and esports community building rather than purely hourly rentals—vision is establishing venue as regional esports destination attracting competitive gamers, sponsorship partnerships, and streaming audiences beyond local casual gaming market.
Saturday championship tournament represents execution of this strategy: $8,000 investment in prize pool, streaming infrastructure, and promotional marketing aims to demonstrate Level Up’s capability hosting professional-quality esports events. Success means: future sponsorship opportunities from gaming peripheral companies and energy drink brands seeking esports marketing channels, tournament organizers booking Level Up for regional competitions, competitive gaming community recognizing venue as legitimate esports destination, streaming partnerships expanding to larger audiences, and transformation from “local gaming cafe” to “regional esports venue” supporting higher-margin tournament business supplementing lower-margin hourly rentals. Tournament failure means: lost $8,000 investment without revenue recovery, sponsor relationship damage eliminating future partnership opportunities, competitive gaming community dismissing Level Up as unprofessional venue incapable of hosting serious esports events, streaming partnership questioning venue’s operational competence, and forced reliance on low-margin hourly rental business without tournament revenue growth strategy.
The FakeBat infection exploited gaming culture fundamentally: malware developers understand gaming community actively seeks performance optimization tools, distributes software through informal channels (Discord servers, Reddit forums, YouTube descriptions), trusts community-recommended utilities over official sources, and downloads third-party programs as routine practice. “CompetitiveEdge Gaming Optimizer” and “ProGamer Performance Suite” represented perfect gaming culture social engineering: names matching gaming community terminology, distribution through Discord servers where competitive gamers share tools, claims providing FPS improvements and input lag reduction gamers specifically seek, and timing during tournament preparation when staff needed rapid station optimization. Nothing about these downloads triggered security awareness: they appeared consistent with normal gaming software discovery, came from sources gaming community trusts, and promised benefits aligned with competitive gaming objectives. FakeBat’s browser-based malware dropper design specifically targets gaming environments: initial payload disguised as executable gaming utility bypassing browser security warnings, secondary malware deployment through compromised browsers avoiding traditional antivirus detection, information stealing focused on payment data and credentials valuable for financial fraud, and command-and-control infrastructure enabling persistent access for long-term data theft.
Jake’s technical investigation reveals infection scope: 23 of 80 gaming stations compromised across Friday evening when multiple staff members and early-arriving tournament participants downloaded “performance tools,” malware established persistent browser hijacking surviving system restarts, payment form injection activated whenever browsers accessed financial websites or Level Up’s integrated payment terminals, keystroke logging captured credentials and payment information during customer transactions, screenshot capability documented payment card entries, and command-and-control connections exfiltrated stolen data to attacker infrastructure. Customer credit card fraud reports suggest FakeBat already achieved payment data theft objective: three customers reporting fraudulent charges totaling $800-1,200 after Friday Level Up visits indicates payment card information was successfully stolen and monetized through underground fraud markets. PCI DSS compliance requirements trigger if payment card data was accessed: mandatory forensic investigation determining breach scope ($15,000-30,000), customer notification to all potentially affected cardholders, credit monitoring services ($50-100 per affected customer annually), potential payment processor fines and increased transaction fees, and possible suspension of card processing capabilities pending security remediation.
Marcus faces decision compressed into 6-hour window before championship tournament: Continue tournament using 57 uninfected gaming stations and risk broadcasting security incident to 3,000+ streaming viewers with sponsors watching while hoping no additional payment card theft occurs (maintains tournament schedule but exposes ongoing security crisis during live event), cancel championship tournament protecting payment security and preventing public incident but losing $8,000 investment and destroying regional esports reputation (chooses customer safety over business opportunity), attempt rapid malware remediation across 23 infected systems during 6-hour window accepting risk that incomplete cleanup might leave residual compromise or system instability during competitive gameplay (balances security response with tournament execution but risks both technical failures during competition and incomplete threat removal), or pivot to “cash-only” tournament operations disabling all payment card processing while using cleaned systems knowing this disappoints sponsors expecting professional event operations and limits concessions revenue (partial risk mitigation with significant operational compromises). Payment card breach investigation requires: forensic analysis determining what customer data was accessed (days of investigation work), notification to payment processors triggering compliance review, potential forensic specialist engagement costing $15,000-30,000, customer notification if breach confirmed, and implementation of remediation controls before payment processing can resume. Every option carries catastrophic consequences: tournament cancellation guarantees financial loss and reputation destruction, continuing tournament risks broadcasting security failure and additional payment card theft, rapid remediation risks incomplete cleanup and competitive gaming disruptions, cash-only operations anger sponsors and limit revenue. Jake summarizes grimly: “FakeBat infection exploited exactly what makes gaming cafes work—customer freedom to download and customize software. Locking down systems prevents malware but destroys gaming cafe value proposition. Tournament timing means we’re deciding between business survival (execute Saturday event maintaining esports reputation) and customer protection (halt operations until security validated). Gaming culture normalized the downloads that infected us, our business model prevented network segmentation that would’ve contained breach, and tournament pressure created security urgency we cannot satisfy in 6-hour window. We face choice between different kinds of failure.”
You’re not just responding to malware—you’re managing a small business existential crisis where championship tournament execution, customer payment security, regional esports reputation, and business survival create impossible prioritization during 6-hour window before 150 tournament participants, 3,000+ streaming viewers, and local sponsors arrive expecting professional competitive gaming event. FakeBat trojan browser-based malware dropper infected 23 of 80 gaming stations through “performance optimization” tools downloaded by staff and participants during Friday tournament preparation—sophisticated social engineering exploiting gaming culture’s normalized third-party software practices where competitive gamers routinely download utilities promising FPS improvements, input lag reduction, and competitive advantages shared through Discord servers and gaming forums. Malware capabilities include browser hijacking for payment form injection, credential harvesting from customer logins, screenshot capture during payment transactions, and command-and-control infrastructure exfiltrating stolen financial data—customer credit card fraud already reported (three customers with $800-1,200 fraudulent charges) confirms active payment data theft requiring PCI DSS breach investigation, forensic analysis determining compromise scope, customer notification to affected cardholders, and potential credit monitoring costs. Saturday championship tournament represents $8,000 investment in prize pool, streaming infrastructure, and promotional marketing—venue’s largest financial commitment and strategic opportunity establishing Level Up as regional esports destination attracting future sponsorships, competitive event bookings, and transformation from local gaming cafe to recognized competitive venue supporting higher-margin tournament business supplementing hourly rentals. Tournament cancellation means total loss of $8,000 investment plus foregone $5,000 revenue, sponsor relationship damage eliminating partnership opportunities, competitive gaming community dismissing venue as unprofessional incapable of hosting serious esports events, and forced reliance on low-margin rental business without tournament growth strategy. Continuing tournament with 57 uninfected stations risks broadcasting security incident to 3,000+ streaming viewers with sponsors watching, potential additional payment card theft affecting tournament participants, system instability during competitive gameplay destroying tournament quality, and live-streamed technical failures becoming viral gaming community content documenting operational incompetence. Gaming cafe business model creates structural security vulnerabilities: customer experience requires software download freedom and system customization destroying restrictive security controls, integrated network architecture combines gaming PCs with payment terminals due to small business cost constraints preventing enterprise network segmentation, public access systems prevent comprehensive endpoint security monitoring, and tournament deadline pressure overrides security verification when critical preparation periods demand operational focus. Payment card breach investigation costs ($15,000-30,000 forensic analysis, credit monitoring services, legal counsel, potential payment processor fines) exceed Level Up’s annual profit margin threatening business survival—small entertainment venue economics cannot absorb enterprise security incident costs while maintaining operational viability. You must decide whether to cancel championship tournament protecting customer payment security and preventing public incident but losing $8,000 investment and destroying regional esports credibility (chooses customer safety over business opportunity), continue tournament using uninfected stations and risk broadcasting security failure while hoping no additional payment theft occurs (maintains schedule but exposes crisis during live event), attempt rapid malware remediation in 6-hour window accepting incomplete cleanup risks affecting competitive gaming performance (balances response with execution but risks both technical failures and residual compromise), or pivot to cash-only operations disabling payment processing while using cleaned systems knowing this limits revenue and disappoints sponsors expecting professional event operations (partial mitigation with operational compromises). There’s no option that executes flawless championship tournament, completes comprehensive malware remediation, protects all customer payment card data, satisfies PCI DSS investigation requirements, maintains sponsor confidence, preserves regional esports reputation, and prevents security incident costs from threatening small business survival. You must choose what matters most when tournament investment recovery, competitive gaming credibility, customer payment security, sponsor relationships, and business economic viability all demand conflicting priorities during gaming culture security crisis where normalized practices created exploitable vulnerabilities that malware developers weaponized against entertainment venue operational model.
Staff have identified suspicious programs customers downloaded:
Jessica (Customer Support Lead) reports: “Payment terminals are on the same network as gaming stations. If those systems are compromised, customer credit card data could be at risk.”
What They Care About: Tournament success, customer trust, business reputation, revenue protection
Current State: Panicking about Saturday tournament—sponsors arriving tomorrow, can’t afford cancellation
Helpful For: Business constraints, tournament requirements, customer relationships, financial priorities
Potential Barrier: May pressure for quick fixes over thorough remediation to save tournament
What They Care About: System integrity, complete malware removal, payment security
Current State: Investigating scope across 80 stations, realizing mass-scale remediation challenge
Helpful For: Technical investigation, system architecture, remediation strategies, gaming station management
Potential Barrier: Overwhelmed by scale—needs guidance on mass station restoration vs individual cleanup
What They Care About: Tournament operations, participant experience, streaming quality, sponsor satisfaction
Current State: Reporting increasing customer complaints, worried about tournament cancellation impacts
Helpful For: Tournament technical requirements, participant expectations, sponsor commitments, backup planning
Potential Barrier: May not understand security implications—focuses on “just make it work for Saturday”
What They Care About: Customer safety, payment security, data protection, service quality
Current State: Handling customer complaints, discovering payment network concerns, worried about data breach
Helpful For: Customer impact assessment, payment system architecture, notification strategies, trust rebuilding
Potential Barrier: May push for customer notification before team is ready with complete information
Hidden Agenda: Already spent tournament sponsorship money on equipment upgrades—cancellation would create financial crisis
Secret Fear: Losing business to competitor gaming cafes if tournament fails or customers lose trust
Character Arc:
Roleplay Notes: Start fixated on tournament timeline, gradually recognize that customer data protection is fundamental to business survival
Hidden Agenda: Recommended trusting customers with admin access to install gaming mods—now realizes this created vulnerability
Secret Doubt: Questioning whether gaming cafe security is even possible with public customer systems
Character Arc:
Roleplay Notes: Transform from defensive and overwhelmed to proactive problem-solver as team demonstrates focus on solution, not blame
Hidden Agenda: Prioritizing sponsor satisfaction over everything—they funded the prize pool and expect successful event
Secret Pressure: Sponsors hinted at future partnerships if tournament succeeds—massive opportunity for venue growth
Character Arc:
Roleplay Notes: Use him to explore business pressure vs security thoroughness—eventually realizes sponsors want association with trustworthy venue, not risky event
Hidden Agenda: Knows customers provided credit card information on potentially compromised systems—legally and ethically concerned about notification requirements
Secret Worry: Personal liability for customer data protection failures—worried she should have escalated payment security concerns earlier
Character Arc:
Roleplay Notes: Use her moral compass to keep team focused on customer protection—transforms from anxiety-driven notification push to thoughtful communication strategy
Monday-Wednesday (Tournament Week): Customers download fake gaming software from compromised gaming-focused websites and ads
Monday, Various Times: Initial FakeBat installations across multiple gaming stations via customer downloads
Tuesday-Wednesday: FakeBat establishes browser hijacking, begins secondary payload downloads
Wednesday Evening: Browser redirections and advertisements become noticeable to customers
Thursday, 12:00 PM: Customer complaints increase, Emma begins investigation
Thursday, 3:45 PM (Current): Emma confirms 80-station compromise scope
Initial Access:
Browser Hijacking:
Secondary Payload Activity:
Data at Risk:
Immediate Danger: 80 gaming stations actively compromised with browser hijacking and ad injection
Escalating Risk: Cryptocurrency miners deploying on gaming PCs, degrading performance before tournament
Critical Threat: Information stealer scheduled to activate Friday evening—would harvest customer payment data and game accounts overnight
Attack Objective: Browser hijacking for ad revenue, cryptocurrency mining for profit, credential theft for account sales
Malmon Identification:
Initial Containment Actions:
Key Discovery: Gaming performance optimization trust created customer-driven infection across public systems
Scope Assessment:
Stakeholder Management:
Critical Decision Point: Team must decide between mass reimaging vs individual cleanup, tournament cancellation vs risk acceptance, customer notification vs silent remediation
Remediation Actions Chosen:
Response Effectiveness:
Outcome Assessment:
Technical Learning:
Collaboration Insights:
Reflection Questions:
Mass Station Reimaging:
Gaming Software Verification System:
Customer Education Program:
Network Segmentation:
Station Isolation:
Payment System Protection:
Antimalware Deployment:
Individual Station Cleanup (-1):
Trusting Customer Actions (-2):
Postponing Remediation (-2):
If team is stuck:
If team rushes to conclusions:
Common mistakes to address:
What Team Knows:
Available Actions:
Fake Software Analysis (DC 10):
Station Scope Assessment (DC 12):
Network Architecture Review (DC 15):
The Gaming Culture Exploitation:
When team investigates how infections spread:
“Customers routinely download ‘performance enhancers,’ ‘FPS optimizers,’ and ‘graphics driver updates’ to improve gaming experience. The fake software looked legitimate—it even appeared to work at first by displaying performance metrics. Gamers trust these tools as part of competitive gaming culture.”
The Scale Realization:
When Emma reports full assessment:
“I’ve completed automated scanning—all 80 gaming stations are compromised. If we do individual cleanup at 2 hours per station, that’s 160 hours of work. We have 48 hours until tournament, and I’m one person. We need a mass solution.”
The Payment Network Risk:
When Jessica investigates payment security:
“Our payment terminals process customer credit cards on the same network as the gaming stations. There’s no segmentation. If attackers pivot from gaming PCs to payment systems, every customer who’s used a credit card here is at risk.”
The Malmon Identity:
When team pieces together attack pattern:
“This is FakeBat—a Downloader/Social malmon that exploits trust in gaming performance software to establish browser hijacking, then downloads secondary payloads. It’s specifically designed to target gaming environments and public computer systems.”
What Team Should Discover:
Stakeholder Reactions:
Transition to Round 2:
“You’ve identified FakeBat across all 80 gaming stations and understand the scale challenge. But as Emma digs deeper into the malware behavior, she discovers something alarming: FakeBat is staging secondary payloads. A cryptocurrency miner is already deploying—and an information stealer is scheduled to activate Friday evening, targeting customer payment data and game account credentials. Your 48-hour timeline just became more urgent.”
Secondary Payload Discovery:
Customer Data Exposure Risk:
Tournament Sponsor Pressure:
Alex reports: “Sponsors are arriving tomorrow to set up branded stations and streaming equipment. They’ve invested $5,000 in the prize pool and expect professional tournament operations. If we cancel, they’ll work with our competitors instead.”
Tony Kim (Cafe Manager):
“I already used the sponsorship money to upgrade our streaming equipment—we needed it to host professional tournaments. If we cancel, I can’t return funds I’ve spent, and we lose future sponsorship opportunities. Can we just clean enough stations for the tournament and fix the rest later?”
Present choice: Partial cleanup for tournament vs complete remediation
Emma Foster (Systems Administrator):
“I can do mass reimaging—we have a master image for gaming stations. It’ll take 24 hours to reimage all 80 stations, or I can do just the 20 tournament stations in 6 hours. But if we don’t fix the underlying issue—customers downloading fake software—we’ll be reinfected within days.”
Present choice: Complete mass remediation vs tournament-only cleanup vs hybrid approach with customer controls
Alex Rodriguez (Tournament Coordinator):
“I need to communicate with 150 registered participants. Do I tell them the tournament is postponed? That we had a security incident? Or do I just confirm everything’s on schedule? Participants are traveling from across the state—some are already in hotels.”
Present choice: Tournament cancellation vs proceeding vs modified timeline
Jessica Wong (Customer Support Lead):
“If that information stealer activates Friday evening, it’ll harvest customer payment data. We have an ethical and possibly legal obligation to notify customers before their data is stolen. But if we tell them now, we’ll create panic and damage our reputation. What do we prioritize—their safety or our business?”
Present choice: Immediate customer notification vs delayed notification vs targeted notification after remediation
Emma’s Technical Assessment:
“Here are our options:
Option A: Mass Reimaging (24 hours)
Option B: Tournament-Only Cleanup (6 hours)
Option C: Hybrid Approach (30 hours)
“Which approach balances security, customer protection, and business needs?”
Secondary Payload Analysis (DC 15):
Mass Remediation Planning (DC 12):
Stakeholder Communication (DC 18):
What Team Must Decide:
The Central Tension:
Public customer systems created vulnerability through gaming culture trust—now that same business model pressures team to prioritize tournament over customer data protection.
Transition to Round 3:
“You have complete technical information about FakeBat’s behavior and timeline. The question now is: What kind of gaming cafe do you want to be? One that prioritizes single events over customer protection? Or one that demonstrates trustworthy security practices even when it costs business in the short term?”
Technical Status:
Stakeholder Positions:
Timeline Pressure:
Path A: Customer Protection Priority (Complete Remediation)
Actions:
Consequences:
Type Effectiveness: Mass Reimaging +3, Software Verification +3, Customer Education +2, Network Segmentation +2
DC Requirements: Technical remediation (DC 15), Sponsor negotiation (DC 18), Customer communication (DC 15)
Path B: Hybrid Approach (Balanced Risk Management)
Actions:
Consequences:
Type Effectiveness: Mass Reimaging +3, Network Segmentation +2, Software Verification +3, Station Isolation +1
DC Requirements: Technical remediation (DC 15), Tournament logistics modification (DC 12), Customer communication (DC 15)
Path C: Tournament Priority (Minimal Remediation)
Actions:
Consequences:
Type Effectiveness: Individual Cleanup -1, Postponing Remediation -2, Trusting Customer Actions -2 (ineffective approaches compound failure)
DC Requirements: All DCs increased +5 due to data breach aftermath, customer lawsuits, regulatory investigation
Mass Remediation (DC 15 for tournament stations, DC 18 for all 80):
Sponsor Communication (DC 18 for postponement, DC 12 for modification):
Customer Notification (DC 15):
Software Verification Deployment (DC 12):
Victory Conditions Met:
Partial Success:
Failure:
Success Narrative Example (Path A or B):
“By Friday morning, all tournament gaming stations are restored to clean baselines with software verification systems preventing reinfection. You’ve notified affected customers about the security incident and your proactive protection measures. Some customers appreciate the transparency; others are concerned but respect your honesty.
“Saturday’s tournament proceeds with 20 secured stations instead of the planned 80. Sponsors are impressed by your transparent handling—they’d rather be associated with a trustworthy venue that handles incidents professionally than one that takes security shortcuts. Several sponsors commit to future partnerships specifically because you demonstrated customer protection priority.
“By Monday, all 80 stations are clean with software verification active. You’ve implemented customer education about safe gaming software sources. Level Up Gaming Cafe becomes known as the secure gaming venue—the place that chose customer protection over a single tournament’s revenue.”
Failure Narrative Example (Path C):
“The tournament proceeds Saturday with manually cleaned stations. Friday evening at 8 PM, the information stealer activates across 60 non-tournament gaming stations, harvesting customer payment data and game account credentials from 300 customers.
“By Sunday, customers report fraudulent charges and compromised game accounts. By Monday, your data breach notification reveals the full scope. Customer lawsuits are filed for negligent data protection. Sponsors distance themselves from the venue, citing security concerns. Competitor cafes advertise your breach in their marketing: ‘Play Secure—We Protect Your Data.’
“Level Up Gaming Cafe faces financial crisis from legal costs, lost business, and reputation damage. The single tournament you saved becomes the event that destroyed your business—because you chose short-term revenue over customer protection.”
What Just Happened (Technical Summary):
Type Effectiveness Review:
Technical Learning Question:
“How would you design gaming cafe security that allows customer freedom while preventing malware reinfection through gaming culture trust?”
Stakeholder Management Review:
Communication Strategies:
Collaboration Learning Question:
“How does public customer system security require different stakeholder management than corporate IT? What unique challenges does gaming culture create?”
Scenario Themes:
Personal Reflection Questions:
Real-World Context:
Session Assessment:
Adaptation Notes for Next Time:
If Team Succeeded:
Acknowledge specific excellent decisions:
What This Victory Means:
“You protected 300 customers from financial fraud and game account theft. You demonstrated that customer security and business success aren’t competing priorities—they’re integrated. Level Up Gaming Cafe will be known as the secure venue, the place that chose customer protection over a single tournament’s revenue. That reputation will drive long-term business growth that far exceeds one event’s sponsorship.”
May your systems stay clean and your tournaments run smoothly!